« Blog Home
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...

By Peter Church

In 1992, the Sydney rain came down on a gutsy SA cricket team’s bid to win the prestigious Cricket World Cup. When Brian McMillan and Dave Richardson returned to the centre, the revised target left them with 22 runs to score off 1 ball! Since that day, the Competition Curse has consistently hovered over the heads of the Proteas, earning them the unfortunate title of chokers.

True, in 1992 the Proteas were lucky to have made the final four at all. Thrust back into international cricket after years of isolation, Kepler Wessels’s team relied on rain interventions and some remarkable knocks by veteran Peter Kirsten to squeak through to a date with England in the semi-final. They played bravely, took their chances, and overall, the outcome was a satisfactory result.

But it was a different story at the World Cup in 1996. The Proteas were rampant. In Rawalpindi, Gary Kirsten scored 188 and Alan Donald nearly knocked the head off the UAE opening bat. The Proteas topped their pool, not raising a sweat or losing a single game in the run up to the quarterfinals. There, they met the Windies, who by contrast had barely won a game during the group stages. Pat Symcox was mysteriously preferred to Alan Donald in the final XI. Brian Lara scored 111 off 94 balls and the Proteas were on their way home with a lump in their throats.

Next time! Next time! 2000. Who will ever forget it? Lance Klusener single-handedly clubbing the Proteas to victory after victory. (Oops! A little slip against Zimbabwe. Remember Neil Johnson?) Then in the super sixes, poised to put Australia out of the Cup, Herschelle Gibbs’s premature celebration of Steve Waugh’s wicket set up a semi-final rematch. Who will forget that match, arguably the most exciting limited over cricket match ever played? I close my eyes and a sea of yellow Australian jerseys invades the pitch at Edgbaston. I listen and can still hear Alan Donald and Lance Klusener whistling: pack up your troubles in an old kit bag. A tied match, which sends the Proteas packing again!

2003. Polly’s the name and, as hosts, it’s our game! Trouble from the outset. Lara again. He scores 116 and the Windies win by 3 runs in the opening game at Newlands. Not such a bad thing, perhaps? The previous two campaigns were marred by not winning the games that counted. Then rain causes havoc against New Zealand and the Proteas lose again. Still, it’s all down to one game. Beat Sri Lanka and the Proteas steam into the Super Sixes with maximum points. Despite Marvin Attapatu’s century, the Proteas are on target. Then the rain threatens. No problem! Boucher’s got a scrap of paper with the Duckworth Lewis target. Murali bowls and Boucher blocks. After all, he’s following instructions. What he doesn’t know is that the mathematics is wrong, and the numbers represent the equivalent and not the winning run target. Another tie and the Proteas are out!

Four years later, Graeme Smith and Mickey Arthur promise brave cricket in the West Indies. They can afford to talk it up; the Proteas are seeded top in one-day cricket. It’s an unusual tournament. Herschelle Gibbs hits six sixes in one over off a hapless Daan van Bunge. Despite a hammering at the hands of Australia, the Proteas cruise into the Super 8. Then they stutter to a win over Sri Lanka and lose abjectly to Bangladesh and New Zealand. But, for a change, the Proteas win the games that count handsomely with powerful victories over the Windies and England to take 4th spot and a place in the semis. Oh-oh. Destiny calling. Australia tops the log. The semi-final sets up a much-vaunted replay of the Edgbaston tied match. Brave cricket becomes stupid cricket at the Beausejour Stadium in Saint Lucia. The match is over as a spectacle after the first few overs, South Africa reduced to 27-5. The normally impeccable Jacques Kallis having his stumps shattered while walking down the wicket to Glenn McGrath, no less, cast a death knell to the belief that impulsive cricket could prevail.

So I wasn’t altogether surprised about this year’s outcome in the ICC Champions Trophy. Few people will remember that we actually did win this trophy in Dhaka in 1998 and the picture of Hansie Cronje holding up the silverware is one for the Rare Moments treasury. But the next five ICC mini-world cups repeat the all too familiar stories of missed opportunities. We can complain about the formats: the only side we beat in this year’s tournament (and easily) played Australia in the final. We can complain about the toss: surely it’s easier to bat first at Centurion in a day-night game? This time around it wasn’t about the rain, or a tie, or Brian Lara. Maybe when we analyse all the reasons, we will conclude that the lottery chances of knock-out cricket don’t suit our fortunes. In the one-on-one, winner takes all stakes, the Proteas have consistently uh, err, uh, not won.

Peter Church is the author of a local thriller called Dark Video www.peterchurch.book.co.za or www.darkvideo.co.za




Related Posts

6 Responses to “Ties in the rain: A history of the C-word”

Shame man, its haunted them for a while now, but just to correct you (im no expert), but the 2000 WC is actually in 1999, and

“What he doesn’t know is that the mathematics is wrong, and the numbers represent the equivalent and not the winning run target” was not the complete story - it was the media spin show SA to have botched up the calculation, but a while back on SAFM during radio commentary, Eric Simons gave the full story. (which i conveniently don’t remember properly - or it was just Simons covering his own @$$.

Keep them coming.

(Report abuse)

Jeremy James on October 19th, 2009 at 12:49 pm

As an australian I really enjoyed reading this. Should you run out of Sjambooek in this self flagellation we will gladly provide the rare kangaroo skin to make a special quality sjamboek.
We will never run out of kangaroes. its the least we can do.

No dont hank me.Thats what friends are for.
I am sure future cricketers reading this will be encouraged not to choke-NOT

(Report abuse)

Haiwa Tigere on October 19th, 2009 at 7:20 pm

The single most important point is that the teams were not the same over the years and I can’t believe that South Africans generally can be branded as bad finishes. They are brilliant at finishing off beer,borewors and biltong.

(Report abuse)

Chris McCallum on October 20th, 2009 at 8:35 am

Beautifully researched and written.
What really caught my eye was the heading “A history of the C word”
In view of the subject and the description of events, some readers will relate the “C” word in this article to mean “Chokers” or synonyms like strangle, suffocate, gag.
On the other hand, some of us would read the meaning of the “C” word in this context slightly differently.
I can’t imagine either Klusener or Donald calling each other Chokers during their first communication after that memorable circus like stunt. The other rendering of the “C” word is far more likely to have been used.
I am sure that I speak for many of my sporting colleagues who have either heard or found occasion to use the other C word, when I say that our experiences would have been far less colourful had we not been able to use the word to describe some of the antics of our fellow players.
Kingdom.

(Report abuse)

Jonathan King on October 20th, 2009 at 9:31 am

Chris makes a fine point. We do indeed enjoy finishing off the finer things in life.

Nice read, and brings back bad memories. I still suffer temporary cold sweats because of 1999 (2000?). Being only 13 at the time, I was scarred for life from that point onwards. Damn it.

On the brightside, we can take out our frustrations on the English who are touring later. Going to be great, especially if Pietersen makes it.

(Report abuse)

Adam Wakefield on October 20th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

Thanks Pete for a thoroughly enjoyable read . . . now what needs to be done to overcome this bothersome tendency?

(Report abuse)

Ian on October 23rd, 2009 at 5:46 pm

Leave a Reply

All comments must be approved by our editors, click here to read the editorial guidelines for comments. Please allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting.

Send me the Thought Leader daily newsletter

profile
Peter Church is the author of the dark thriller, Bitter Pill published in August this year.

He is a proud supporter of South African sport, especially the Proteas and Springboks. His earliest sporting memory is listening to the muddy 1970 Springbok-All Black second rugby Test on the radio in his Dad's car. He stills manages the odd cricket game for the renowned Ridge CC in Cape Town. His previous novel, Dark Video was published by Struik/Random House in South Africa 2008 and New Holland in Australia 2009.

Read the 1st chapter of Bitter Pill online



Technorati RSS
Peter's links
Bitter Pill on Amazon
Bitter Pill on Amazon Kindle
Books Live - Peter Church
Read reviews of Peter Church's books Bitter Pill and Dark Video.
Dark Video on Amazon
Dark Video on Amazon
more posts
The All Blacks are world champions and deservedly so. But I have to admit I got very excited when Le Bleus (wearing white, how were the jerseys this W...
As Frik du Preez might have said: We take their line-out ball, we smash them in the scrums, we kill them in the rucks, but the score still says Ozzies...
If betting odds are any indication, then New Zealand will play England in the final of RWC 2011. The weekend’s results have caused a major shuffle a...
Unlike the Fifa World Cup where even a favourite team can be eliminated in the pool stages, the outcome of rugby's premier tournament is far more pred...
The faithful will be ecstatic, the doubters unconvinced as the Springboks retained their record of never having lost to the All Blacks in Port Elizabe...
latest activity
Blog Statistics
Total reads 8566
Total comments 67
Peter's tags
advertisement
All material copyright of the author, or the Mail & Guardian, unless otherwise specified
Author Login
Afrigator