« Blog Home
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...

You win five on the trot and then you stumble at the penultimate hurdle. For most teams, that would be a pretty good run which was bound to end some time.

But for Graeme Smith and co, that is mere confirmation of their world-class choke-ability, right?

Wrong!

It cannot be classed a choke when you come up against a side that blows hot and cold as frequently as the Pakistanis. As woeful as they were against England in the group stages, they were clinical against the Proteas.

Take Shahid Afridi for instance. He couldn’t hit it off the square all tournament, but from his first ball against the Proteas he was in the mood.

No team in world cricket, save perhaps the West Indies, is as unpredictable as Pakistan. They are like the French rugby side of international cricket. Vastly talented and quite capable of making any side look ordinary on their day. Even in winning, they almost stuffed it up.

Umar Gul only bowled three of his allotted four overs, but it didn’t matter in the end. What Gul did to Jean-Paul Duminy and Jacques Kallis was exceptional. To bowl 10 out of 12 perfect yorkers, in the heat of the moment, takes mind-boggling brilliance.

That’s the same guy who dropped a dolly off Smith, and has frequently looked amateurish in the field.

But boy can he bowl.

You simply can’t hit inswinging toe-crushers for six, no matter who you are.

The one area where the Proteas had been suspect in the World T20 was their usage of Albie Morkel. He is a great hitter of pace, but he cannot be expected to do it from a standing start. Ten minutes of Morkel will hardly affect a result, but 10 overs certainly would.

Time and again they papered over this by defending small totals. But they were found out against Pakistan, chasing a stiff target against a good attack.

Smith would have expected more of himself, and Herschelle Gibbs and AB de Villiers were simply caught up in the Afridi blitz.

So to call this match a choke would be to deny what it really was.

A simply rampant display from cricket’s notorious dark horses. They batted bravely, bowled magnificently and stormed their way to another T20 final.

For the Proteas, there is the bitter realisation that one average performance has taken more significance than the five good ones preceding it. Again they have fallen just short of glory.

Choking implies staring glory in the face, then blinking it away as you lose your nerve.

The Proteas were never in control of the game, because Afridi simply grabbed the initiative early on.

But to be honest, there is no shame in being humbled by a talented outfit that was in the mood for upsets. It’s happened before, and it most certainly will happen again.




Related Posts

6 Responses to “Choking is not quite the word for it”

I’d have to disagree on this. Yes, on this occasion they came across a mercurial and unpredictable side- but the fact still stands that when it comes to the big matches (knockout matches, semi-finals etc), SA is absolutely unable to lift their game to special levels.

Obviously there are some notable excetions (434 et al), but generally they lack that special oomph from one player that takes them over the edge.

My own armchair prognosis on this is as follows: too much textbook, not enough imagination. Let’s face it, with the exception of certain players, the overall team has never been a particularly imaginative side. Less rigour and more personality is the answer… I think!

All that notwithstanding, we should indeed be applauding them for reaching the semi’s. That’s certainly nothing to be ashamed of.

(Report abuse)

Nausher Rahman on June 19th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

Yes, beaten by a much better side, and one with imagination, flare and a freedom from the stultifying military do-or-die disciplines that have dogged the Proteas for years now. On a technical level, they have spent years trying to play spin, and have just about mastered it - even bringing in an arm-bender as acknowledgment that pace isn’t everyhting (sorry, choking - I thought you said chucking). How long will they take to learn how to play swing? - though as you said, when Pakistanis swing the ball nobody can play it.
The fielding was uninspiring, not least from the skipper, and the old formula of Kallis sheet-anchoring and bowling like a beached whale while Gibbs hits sixes in the school playground is becoming all too formulaic.
Are there no young players in South Africa worth a contract - Boucher, Kallis, Gibbs, Smith - where is the new blood? At least try it for 20-20 and 50-50, even if not for test matches, where stiff joints and a few extra pounds are not so critical.
Sorry, but if it wasn’t a fun game (and when did the Proteas last enjoy a cricket match) it would be an absolute disgrace. Talk about self-confidence, misplaced pride, we are the favourites, we are the greatest … oh yes, and where is all the support? Shopping in Sloane Square no doubt?

(Report abuse)

Andrew Curmudgeon on June 19th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

@andrew - firstly, there is plenty of youth. smith is only 28. steyn, de villiers and duminy are all 25. vd merwe is 24. parnell is 19. to criticise the lack of youth is bunk.

second, the fielding has been exceptional throughout the tournament. one bad day does not undo all the mileage gained by exemplary fielding. indeed, it is sa that has taken fielding to the next level.

third, kallis at the top is a sensible move. it’s the best place for him, and ipl experience suggests the same. (have a squiz at his numbers.) gibbs is a dasher. to say that these two fulfil their roles is formulaic is silly. it’s like saying ‘gul bowling yorkers is formulaic.’ i wonder why. maybe because it works.

fourth, to say kallis bowls like a beached whale makes me wonder if you’re talking about someone esle. what nonsense.

fifth, there was nothing disgraceful about the semi or the sa team’s showing at any time in the competition. what have you talking about?

last, ‘talk about misplaced pride’. what are you on about? pride in your country is very rarely misplaced. what are you claiming? ‘oh yes, and where is all the support?’ clearly not where you are, what with you proposing bogus arguments for why sa lost.

(Report abuse)

gph on June 22nd, 2009 at 9:39 am

Chokers? Not a bit of it. There was only seven runs in the loss. The game was lost when skipper Smith foolishly skied a ball after being dropped for a similar shot by Gul. Smith threw away his wicket the same way in the two previous games. All he and Kallis had to do was stay and puncture the field with carpet level boundaries and build the innings. Smith was simply foolish and from his demeanour in the dugout immediately afterwards, he knew it. If – he had struck the ball cleanly, different story. Pakistan took their chances and succeeded. No other team had a game plan that held a bowler of Gul’s quality back to the 13th over onwards. He was a wonderful attack/defence player which made the difference.

(Report abuse)

Dominosix on June 22nd, 2009 at 1:13 pm

What do you expect opening the batting with Kallis?He is not explosive and never will be.Gibbs is at his best in the first 6 overs where fielding restrictions are in place.
My point of view is that Kallis should not even be near the 50 over side.He is a great player no doubt, but not suited to this format.

(Report abuse)

Kurt on June 22nd, 2009 at 10:20 pm

Kurt. I once held your view about Kallis and the short form game (ODI and T20 but have to admit he has re-invented himself and fits into the shorter formats extremely well. My argument stands: Look at the semi-final facts: Smith skied his wicket at over 5.5 with South Africa on 40 runs. Smith had only ten runs with one four and a strike rate of 7.1. Kallis was already on 30. He went on to make 64 with one six and seven boundaries and a S/R of 118,51. Kallis was named for the so-called international T20 side. In the tournament he scored 238 to finish second on the list with 28 boundaries and four sixes. Smith languished at No 15 with 149 runs with 21 boundaries and one six. Smith’s rash skiers in his last three matches cost him and the Proteas dearly.

(Report abuse)

Dominosix on June 23rd, 2009 at 3:24 pm

Leave a Reply

All comments must be approved by our editors, click here to read the editorial guidelines for comments. Please allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting.

Send me the Thought Leader daily newsletter

profile
Lungani Zama is a sports writer at The Witness daily newspaper in Pietermaritzburg, writing mainly on local and international cricket.

He brings an alternative perspective to the English Premier League, and having spent three years in Manchester and Liverpool playing professional cricket, has acquired the necessary passion for this most exciting of soccer leagues. He follows developments religiously, and has no bias as the team he truly supports, Leeds United, is languishing in the 3rd division.
Technorati RSS
more posts
Let's get one thing straight here, folks. David Beckham's absence from the World Cup is probably a blessing in disguise for Fabio Capello and England'...
So now England may be in the market for a new captain. Since John Terry's Tiger-esque demise -- in the space of one weekend, the entire Soccer Worl...
Sport, being the great equaliser that it is, simply waits for no man and respects no reputations. This time last year, the world was Graeme Smith'...
The legendary former Australian rugby captain, John Eales, was known as "Nobody". It was not for lack of talent -- because any goal-kicking lock f...
Forget the Thierry Henry of Arsenal days. Forget the mazy runs, the languid sprint and the delightful finishes. There is only one Henry that football ...
latest activity
Blog Statistics
Total reads 14006
Total comments 103
Lungani's tags
advertisement
All material copyright of the author, or the Mail & Guardian, unless otherwise specified
Author Login
Afrigator